Legislature(2003 - 2004)
2004-05-11 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf2004-05-11 Senate Journal Page 3720 HB 495 CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 495(FIN) "An Act allowing a joint action agency to encumber property interests for security purposes; declaring certain joint action agencies to be political subdivisions for certain purposes; restricting the sale of property of the joint action agency; allowing the joint action agency to transfer property to security interest holders under a security interest or to other parties without legislative approval; and providing for an effective date" was read the second time. Senator Wilken, Cochair, moved and asked unanimous consent for the adoption of the Finance Senate Committee Substitute offered on page 3597. Without objection, SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 495(FIN) was adopted. Senator Ben Stevens moved and asked unanimous consent that the bill be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. Without objection, it was so ordered. SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 495(FIN) was read the third time. The question being: "Shall SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 495(FIN) "An Act allowing a joint action agency to encumber property interests for security purposes; declaring certain joint action agencies to be political subdivisions for certain purposes; restricting the sale of property of the joint action agency; allowing the joint action 2004-05-11 Senate Journal Page 3721 agency to transfer property to security interest holders under a security interest or to other parties without legislative approval; and providing for an effective date" pass the Senate?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 495(FIN) Third Reading - Final Passage YEAS: 11 NAYS: 9 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Ellis, Elton, French, Guess, Lincoln, Olson, Stedman, Stevens G Nays: Dyson, Green, Hoffman, Ogan, Seekins, Stevens B, Therriault, Wagoner, Wilken Wilken changed from "Yea" to "Nay". Ogan changed from "Yea" to "Nay". Green changed from "Yea" to "Nay". Hoffman changed from "Yea" to "Nay". Dyson changed from "Yea" to "Nay". Wagoner changed from "Yea" to "Nay". and so, SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 495(FIN) passed the Senate. Senator Ben Stevens moved for the adoption of the effective date clause. The question being: "Shall the effective date clause be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 495(FIN) Effective Date Clause YEAS: 20 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Ellis, Elton, French, Green, Guess, Hoffman, Lincoln, Ogan, Olson, Seekins, Stedman, Stevens B, Stevens G, Therriault, Wagoner, Wilken and so, the effective date clause was adopted and the bill was referred to the Secretary for engrossment.